
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany)
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany)
2 Projects, page 1 of 1
assignment_turned_in Project2022 - 2024Partners:Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany), University of OxfordThermo Fisher Scientific,Thermo Fisher Scientific,Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany),University of OxfordFunder: UK Research and Innovation Project Code: EP/V051474/1Funder Contribution: 367,126 GBPIn order to take a picture of a large biological molecule, such as a protein, it has to be frozen in a very thin sheet of ice where it can be imaged by an electron microscope. Many images of the same type of molecule are laid over another to improve the resolution, ultimately revealing atomic positions. This procedure requires a highly pure protein sample in solution and plunge freezing of water films hanging in very fine mesh grids, a procedure which is not compatible with all proteins. In particular proteins that reside in cell membranes, prefer to be at the water-air surface, where they are destroyed and thus cannot be imaged. Also protein, which are composed from many subunits cannot be purified sufficiently so that the averaging will fail produce a high resolution image. This proposal aims at developing an alternative sample preparation method, based on native electrospray mass spectrometry. Native electrospray ionisation can transfer a protein from solution into a gaseous particle with charge, which can be weighed (by mass spectrometry) and hence chemically identified. We will use this process to isolate the particle and instead of only detecting it, we will enrich one selected type of protein on the sample for electron microscopy. The major challenge thereby is to land the molecule so gentle, that it's characteristic native shape is not destroyed in the process. With mass-selected sample fabrication we can link chemical information to protein structure, which is information highly desirable in the development of medicine and biology.
more_vert assignment_turned_in Project2020 - 2026Partners:Finnish Meteorological Institute, Utrecht University, Wageningen University, University of California Los Angeles, UGOE +19 partnersFinnish Meteorological Institute,Utrecht University,Wageningen University,University of California Los Angeles,UGOE,University of Manchester,University of Edinburgh,Forest Research,University of Salford,South African Weather Service,FMI,University of Groningen University of Warwick,Forest Research (Penicuik),WU,University of California Los Angeles,ARI,NILU,LVM,University of Reading,South African Weather Service,Thermo Fisher Scientific,Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany),Norwegian Institute for Air Res. (NILU),Aerodyne Research Inc.Funder: UK Research and Innovation Project Code: NE/V007149/1Funder Contribution: 575,808 GBPThe greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) are by far the biggest contributors to recent and ongoing climate change. Of all the known greenhouse gases (excluding water vapour), CO2 and CH4 have the highest concentrations in the atmosphere and they are rising rapidly. CO2 is particularly problematic because there is so much of it (about 200 times more than CH4) and because once emitted to the atmosphere, much of it will stay there for several hundred years. Whereas, by comparison, CH4 has a lifetime in the atmosphere of about a decade, but it is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 - that is, for equal amounts of CO2 and CH4 in the atmosphere, CH4 will trap heat radiation about 70 times more effectively than CO2 (over a 20-year time period). With the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the world has committed to avoiding dangerous climate change and the most obvious way to do this is by reducing emissions of CO2 and CH4. How will we know if emission mitigation policies are effective? Which nations or regions are meeting their emissions reduction targets? How will natural CO2 and CH4 fluxes respond to extreme weather events? And which aspects of the carbon cycle remain unsolved? For example, despite decades of study, scientists are still not sure why CH4 emissions are currently rising. To answer these questions we need to be able to measure and quantify CO2 and CH4 emissions and concentrations, and have the ability to separately quantify natural and manmade sources. Our current abilities to do so are severely limited, especially for CH4, which has a diverse array of natural and manmade sources. If we cannot determine the effectiveness of mitigation policies, then our ability to predict climate change impacts will be compromised by large uncertainties. 'Polyisotopologues' are one very promising new tool for distinguishing between different source emissions. The chemical elements that make up CO2 and CH4 molecules (carbon (C), oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H)) can have different masses, called isotopes. Different sources can have different isotopic 'fingerprints' or 'signatures' (because source reaction processes may favour a lighter or heavier molecule), thus measuring isotopic signatures is a useful way to gain insight into sources. Isotopic measurements have been made routinely for several decades; whereas the state-of-the-art technology developed in this project would allow us to measure molecules with more than one rare isotope. For example, most C has a relative atomic mass of 12 and H a mass of 1. The rarer isotopes of C and H have masses of 13 and 2, respectively. Isotopologues of CH4, which are measured routinely, include 12CH4, 13CH4 and 12CH3D (where 'D' represents the heavy H atom with mass 2). Whereas polyisotopologues of CH4 include 13CH3D and 12CH2D2 - these are far more challenging to measure, yet could provide invaluable insight into source emissions and sinks. POLYGRAM (POLYisotopologues of GReenhouse gases: Analysis and Modelling) will push the frontiers for both CO2 and CH4 polyisotopologue measurement capability using the latest advances in laser spectroscopic analysis and very high-resolution isotope ratio mass spectrometry. In addition to these challenging technological developments, we will establish a small global atmospheric sampling network to examine latitudinal and longitudinal variations in polyisotopologues, which will help us to constrain overall global budgets of CO2 and CH4. We will carry out field campaigns to determine polyisotopologue source signatures, for example, of CH4 from wetlands, cattle and landfills, and of CO2 from plant photosynthesis and respiration, and from fossil fuel burning. We will conduct laboratory experiments to estimate the reaction rates for CH4 isotopologues when they are oxidised and destroyed in the atmosphere. Finally, we will carry out atmospheric transport modelling for both gases to better interpret and understand the measurements.
more_vert