• shareshare
  • link
  • cite
  • add
Other research product . 2014

Scaling in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation

Henle, Klaus; Potts, Simon; Kunin, William; Matsinos, Yiannis; Simila, Jukka; Pantis, John; Grobelnik, Vesna; +2 Authors
Open Access
Published: 01 Jan 2014
Publisher: Pensoft Publishers
Human actions, motivated by social and economic driving forces, generate various pressures on biodiversity, such as habitat loss and fragmentation, climate change, land use related disturbance patterns, or species invasions that have an impact on biodiversity from the genetic to the ecosystem level. Each of these factors acts at characteristic scales, and the scales of social and economic demands, of environmental pressures, of biodiversity impacts, of scientific analysis, and of governmental responses do not necessarily match. However, management of the living world will be effective only if we understand how problems and solutions change with scale. SCALES (, a research project lasting for five years from May 2009 to July 2014, was seeking for ways to build the issue of scale into policy and decision-making and biodiversity management. It has greatly advanced our knowledge of how anthropogenic and natural processes interact across scales and affect biodiversity and it has evaluated in a very practical way how this knowledge can be used to improve the scale-sensitivity and effectiveness of policy instruments for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. During the project we have especially emphasized approaches that utilize existing biodiversity databases as they are the most widely available information in applied biodiversity conservation. We also tried to integrate the most appropriate assessment tools and policy instruments into a coherent framework to support biodiversity conservation across spatial and temporal scales. While the guidelines, practical solutions and special tools are presented as a special web based portal at a central place, the SCALETOOL (, the scientific outcome is widely spread over the scientific literature in regional and international journals. With the SCALES book we want to bundle the main results of SCALES in a comprehensive manner and present it in a way that is usable not only for pure scientists but also for people making decisions in administration, management, policy or even business and NGOs; to people who are more interested in the “practical” side of this issue. Yrjö Haila, Tampere

contemporary, past decades, future scenarios until 2050

41 references, page 1 of 5

Adger WN, Brown K, Fairbrass J, Jordan A, Paavola J, Rosendo S, Seyfang G (2003) Governance for sustainability: Towards a `thick' analysis of environmental decisionmaking. Environment and Planning A 35: 1095-1110. [OpenAIRE]

Biermann F, Betsill MM, Gupta J, Kanie N, Lebel L, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Siebenhüner B (2009) Earth System Governance. People, Places, and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20. IHDP, Bonn.

Brechin S, Wilshusen P, Fortwangler C, West P (2002) Beyond the square wheel: Towards a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15: 41-64, doi: 10.1080/089419202317174011 [OpenAIRE]

Connelly S, Richardson T, Miles T (2006) Situated legitimacy: Deliberative arenas and the new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies 22: 267-277.

Green DR (2010) The role of Public Participatory Geographical Information Systems (PPGIS) in coastal decisionmaking processes: An example from Scotland, UK. Ocean & Coastal Management 53: 816-821.

Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska A, Cent J, Scott AV, Apostolopoulou E, Paloniemi R (2014) Governance of network of protected areas: Innovative solutions and instruments. In: Henle K, Potts SG, Kunin WE, Matsinos YG, Similä J, Pantis JD, Grobelnik V, Penev L, Settele J (Eds) Scaling in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 119-123. [OpenAIRE]

Schlossberg M, Shuford E (2005) Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS (Public Participation Geographic Information System). Urban and Regional Information System Association (URISA) Journal 16 (2): 15-26.

Smith PD, McDonough MH (2001) Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14: 239-249.

Stern JM (2008) The power of trust: Toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 21: 859-875.

Tyler TR (2004) Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593: 84-99.

Funded by
Securing the Conservation of biodiversity across Administrative Levels and spatial, temporal, and Ecological Scales
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 226852
  • Funding stream: FP7 | SP1 | ENV
AKA| Coping with incomplete data in conservation assessments and policy tools
  • Funder: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  • Project Code: 250126
Status and Trends of European Pollinators
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 244090
  • Funding stream: FP7 | SP1 | ENV
Related to Research communities
SDSN - Greece Sustainable Development Projects : Status and Trends of European Pollinators
Download from