• SDSN - Greece
• Other research products close
• ES close

One of the challenges in studying desert dust aerosol along with its numerous interactions and impacts is the paucity of direct in situ measurements, particularly in the areas most affected by dust storms. Satellites typically provide column-integrated aerosol measurements, but observationally constrained continuous 3D dust fields are needed to assess dust variability, climate effects and impacts upon a variety of socio-economic sectors. Here, we present a high-resolution regional reanalysis data set of desert dust aerosols that covers Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe along with the Mediterranean Sea and parts of central Asia and the Atlantic and Indian oceans between 2007 and 2016. The horizontal resolution is 0.1◦ latitude × 0.1◦ longitude in a rotated grid, and the temporal resolution is 3 h. The reanalysis was produced using local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) data assimilation in the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (MONARCH) developed at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC). The assimilated data are coarse-mode dust optical depth retrieved from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue Level 2 products. The reanalysis data set consists of upper-air variables (dust mass concentrations and the extinction coefficient), surface variables (dust deposition and solar irradiance fields among them) and total column variables (e.g. dust optical depth and load). Some dust variables, such as concentrations and wet and dry deposition, are expressed for a binned size distribution that ranges from 0.2 to 20 µm in particle diameter. Both analysis and first-guess (analysis-initialized simulation) fields are available for the variables that are diagnosed from the state vector. A set of ensemble statistics is archived for each output variable, namely the ensemble mean, standard deviation, maximum and median. The spatial and temporal distribution of the dust fields follows well-known dust cycle features controlled by seasonal changes in meteorology and vegetation cover. The analysis is statistically closer to the assimilated retrievals than the first guess, which proves the consistency of the data assimilation method. Independent evaluation using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) dust-filtered optical depth retrievals indicates that the reanalysis data set is highly accurate (mean bias = −0.05, RMSE = 0.12 and r = 0.81 when compared to retrievals from the spectral de-convolution algorithm on a 3-hourly basis). Verification statistics are broadly homogeneous in space and time with regional differences that can be partly attributed to model limitations (e.g. poor representation of small-scale emission processes), the presence of aerosols other than dust in the observations used in the evaluation and differences in the number of observations among seasons. Such a reliable high-resolution historical record of atmospheric desert dust will allow a better quantification of dust impacts upon key sectors of society and economy, including health, solar energy production and transportation. The reanalysis data set (Di Tomaso et al., 2021) is distributed via Thematic Real-time Environmental Distributed Data Services (THREDDS) at BSC and is freely available at http://hdl.handle.net/21.12146/c6d4a608-5de3-47f6-a004-67cb1d498d98 (last access: 10 June 2022). Article signat per 24 autors/es: Enza Di Tomaso (1) , Jerónimo Escribano (1) , Sara Basart (1) , Paul Ginoux (2) , Francesca Macchia (1) , Francesca Barnaba (3) , Francesco Benincasa (1), Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière (1), Arnau Buñuel (1), Miguel Castrillo (1), Emilio Cuevas (4) , Paola Formenti (5) , María Gonçalves (1,6), Oriol Jorba (1), Martina Klose (1,7), Lucia Mona (8), Gilbert Montané Pinto (1) , Michail Mytilinaios (8), Vincenzo Obiso (1,a), Miriam Olid (1), Nick Schutgens (9) , Athanasios Votsis (10,11), Ernest Werner (12), and Carlos Pérez García-Pando (1,13) // (1) Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain; (2) NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA; (3) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche–Istituto di Scienze dell’Atmosfera e del Clima (CNR–ISAC), Rome, Italy; (4) Izaña Atmospheric Research Center (IARC), Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (AEMET), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (5) Université Paris Cité and Univ Paris-Est Créteil, CNRS, LISA, 75013 Paris, France; (6) Department of Project and Construction Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – BarcelonaTech (UPC), Terrassa, Spain; (7) Department Troposphere Research, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-TRO), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany; (8) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche–Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale (CNR–IMAA), Tito Scalo (PZ), Italy; (9) Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; (10) Section of Governance and Technology for Sustainability (BMS-CSTM), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; (11) Weather and Climate Change Impact Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland; (12) Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (AEMET), Barcelona, Spain; (13) ICREA, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain anow at: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), New York, New York, USA This research has been supported by the DustClim project, which is part of ERA4CS, an ERA-NET programme co-funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 690462); the European Research Council (FRAGMENT (grant no. 773051)); grant no. RYC-2015- 18690 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF Investing in your future; grant no. CGL2017-88911-R funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF A way of making Europe; the AXA Research Fund (AXA Chair on Sand and Dust Storms); the European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (grant no. 792103 (SOLWARIS)); and ATMO-ACCESS (Access to Atmospheric Research Facilities) funded in the frame of the programme H2020-EU.1.4.1.2 (grant no. 101008004, 1 April 2021–31 March 2025). Jerónimo Escribano and Martina Klose have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreements H2020-MSCACOFUND-2016-754433 and H2020-MSCA-IF-2017-789630, respectively. Martina Klose received further support through the Helmholtz Association’s Initiative and Networking Fund (grant no. VH-NG-1533). This work has been partially funded by the contribution agreement between AEMET and BSC to carry out development and improvement activities of the products and services supplied by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Barcelona Dust Regional Center (i.e. the WMO Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System (SDS-WAS) Regional Center for Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe). Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::13 - Acció per al Clima::13.3 - Millorar l’educació, la conscienciació i la capacitat humana i institucional en relació amb la mitigació del canvi climàtic, l’adaptació a aquest, la reducció dels efectes i l’alerta primerenca Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::13 - Acció per al Clima Peer Reviewed

The authors acknowledge European Research Council (GASPARCON, Grant no. 714621 and COALA, Grant no. 638703), Academy of Finland (Project nos. 296628, 306853, 317380, 316114, and 320094), INTERACT, European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42), Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Project J3951-N36), the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (Grant no. 689443) via project iCUPE (Integrative and Comprehensive Understanding on Polar Environments) and Project ERC-2016- COG 726349 CLIMAHAL, National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2018R1A2A1A19019281), Knut-and-Alice-Wallenberg Foundation within the Arctic Climate Across Scales (Project No. \,2016.0024), the Swedish EPA's (Naturvårdsverket) Environmental monitoring program (Miljöövervakning), the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (Project "Interplay between water, clouds and Aerosols in the Arctic," \# 2016-01427), Climate Change Tower – Integrated Project of the National Research Council of Italy and the National Interest Project by the Italian Minister of Education, University and Research (PRIN2007 and PRIN2009). The authors thank Department of Earth System Sciences and Technologies for the Environment, Department of Earth Sciences and Technology of the Environment of CNR and the doctoral program in atmospheric sciences at the University of Helsinki for financial support. Aarhus University acknowledge financial support from Danish Ministry of Environment and food and Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities by means of DANCEA. New particle formation in the Arctic atmosphere is an important source of aerosol particles. Understanding the processes of Arctic secondary aerosol formation is crucial due to their significant impact on cloud properties and therefore Arctic amplification. We observed the molecular formation of new particles from low-volatility vapors at two Arctic sites with differing surroundings. In Svalbard, sulfuric acid (SA) and methane sulfonic acid (MSA) contribute to the formation of secondary aerosol and to some extent to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). This occurs via ion-induced nucleation of SA and NH and subsequent growth by mainly SA and MSA condensation during springtime and highly oxygenated organic molecules during summertime. By contrast, in an ice-covered region around Villum, we observed new particle formation driven by iodic acid but its concentration was insufficient to grow nucleated particles to CCN sizes. Our results provide new insight about sources and precursors of Arctic secondary aerosol particles. 11 pags., 4 figs. Peer reviewed

We present the dust module in the Multiscale Online Non-hydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (MONARCH) version 2.0, a chemical weather prediction system that can be used for regional and global modeling at a range of resolutions. The representations of dust processes in MONARCH were upgraded with a focus on dust emission (emission parameterizations, entrainment thresholds, considerations of soil moisture and surface cover), lower boundary conditions (roughness, potential dust sources), and dust–radiation interactions. MONARCH now allows modeling of global and regional mineral dust cycles using fundamentally different paradigms, ranging from strongly simplified to physics-based parameterizations. We present a detailed description of these updates along with four global benchmark simulations, which use conceptually different dust emission parameterizations, and we evaluate the simulations against observations of dust optical depth. We determine key dust parameters, such as global annual emission/deposition flux, dust loading, dust optical depth, mass-extinction efficiency, single-scattering albedo, and direct radiative effects. For dust-particle diameters up to 20¿µm, the total annual dust emission and deposition fluxes obtained with our four experiments range between about 3500 and 6000¿Tg, which largely depend upon differences in the emitted size distribution. Considering ellipsoidal particle shapes and dust refractive indices that account for size-resolved mineralogy, we estimate the global total (longwave and shortwave) dust direct radiative effect (DRE) at the surface to range between about -0.90 and -0.63¿W¿m-2 and at the top of the atmosphere between -0.20 and -0.28¿W¿m-2. Our evaluation demonstrates that MONARCH is able to reproduce key features of the spatiotemporal variability of the global dust cycle with important and insightful differences between the different configurations. This research has been supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 789630. Martina Klose has received funding through the Helmholtz Association’s Initiative and Networking Fund (grant agreement no. VH-NG-1533). Jeronimo Escribano and Matthew L. Dawson have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreements no. 754433 (Jeronimo Escribano) and no. 747048 (Matthew Dawson). BSC co-authors acknowledge funding from the following: the European Research Council (FRAGMENT (grant no. 773051)); the AXA Research Fund; the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (grant no. CGL2017- 88911-R); the EU H2020 project FORCES (grant no. 821205); the CMUG-CCI3-TECHPROP contract, an activity carried out under a program of and funded by the European Space Agency (ESA); and the DustClim project, which is part of ERA4CS, an ERA-NET initiated by JPI Climate and funded by FORMAS (SE), DLR (DE), BMWFW (AT), IFD (DK), MINECO (ES), and ANR (FR), with cofunding by the European Union (grant no. 690462). Ron L. Miller is funded by the NASA Modeling, Analysis and Prediction Program (NNG14HH42I). Jasper F. Kok acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant nos. 1552519 and 1856389 and the Army Research Office (grant no. W911NF-20- 2-0150). Yue Huang has received funding from the Columbia University Earth Institute Postdoctoral Research Fellowship and from NASA (grant no. 80NSSC19K1346) awarded under the Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST) program. Peer Reviewed

Under the influence of global warming, heatwaves are becoming a major threat in many parts of the world, affecting human health and mortality, food security, forest fires, biodiversity, energy consumption, as well as the production and transportation networks. Seasonal forecasting is a promising tool to help mitigate these impacts on society. Previous studies have highlighted some predictive capacity of seasonal forecast systems for specific strong heatwaves such as those of 2003 and 2010. To our knowledge, this study is thus the first of its kind to systematically assess the prediction skill of heatwaves over Europe in a state-of-the-art seasonal forecast system. One major prerequisite to do so is to appropriately define heatwaves. Existing heatwave indices, built to measure heatwave duration and severity, are often designed for specific impacts and thus have limited robustness for an analysis of heatwave variability. In this study, we investigate the seasonal prediction skill of European summer heatwaves in the ECMWF System 5 operational forecast system by means of several dedicated metrics, as well as its added-value compared to a simple statistical model based on the linear trend. We are able to show, for the first time, that seasonal forecasts initialized in early May can provide potentially useful information of summer heatwave propensity, which is the tendency of a season to be predisposed to the occurrence of heatwaves. This work is a contribution to the HyMeX program through the project ERA4CS-MEDSCOPE, co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Program of the European Union (Grant agreement 690462). Chloe Prodhomme and Javier García-Serrano were supported by the Spanish Juan de la Cierva (IJCI-2016-30802) and Ramon y Cajal (RYC-2016-21181) programs, respectively. Rachel H. White received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement 797961. Peer Reviewed

The film shares the project main aims and the key results. It includes the point of view on energy matters from general public, industry and stakeholders; the state of the art of renewable primary energy production systems; and the transition scenarios with simulation results and the role played by the meetings with stakeholders A short documentary film about the topics of the MEDEAS project (EU H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 691287) Peer reviewed

El calentamiento global y las actividades humanas están favoreciendo la expansión geográfica de las especies marinas tropicales y subtropicales a latitudes más altas. Para la detección de estos organismos es de gran relevancia la participación ciudadana, la cual debe estar debidamente informada. El caso que se presenta es el de la proliferación de la microalga tropical Ostreopsis cuya detección desde finales de los años 90 ha ido en aumento en la costa Mediterránea, alcanzando, en algunas áreas, grandes concentraciones de células. Algunas proliferaciones de Ostreopsis son nocivas y se han relacionado con diferentes impactos en los ecosistemas y en la salud y el bienestar humano, incluidas mortalidades masivas de fauna bentónica, mucílagos que cubren los fondos marinos, espumas en la superficie del agua e irritaciones respiratorias leves en personas expuestas a los aerosoles marinos de las playas donde prolifera. La prevención de estos impactos requiere enfoques multidisciplinares que involucren a científicos, autoridades de salud pública y ambiental, y a las personas potencialmente afectadas. Hemos llegado al público objetivo mediante múltiples actividades de divulgación para proporcionarles la información básica sobre estas proliferaciones, sus efectos y cómo reconocerlas en la playa. Estas actividades se han realizado a través de diferentes canales de comunicación como son 1) folletos informativos; 2) sitio web ICMDivulga (http://icmdivulga.icm.csic.es/); 3) vídeos de corto formato (3 a 4 minutos) en tres idiomas (español, catalán e inglés); 4) participación en ferias y festivales del mar mediante pósters y talleres con microscopios; y finalmente, 5) comunicación con la ciudadanía mediante dos plataformas de ciencia ciudadana a través de ICMDivulga (http://icmdivulga.icm.csic.es/colabora-con-ostreorisk/) y Observadores del Mar y se discuten los logros y dificultades de estas actividades La investigación presentada en este trabajo ha sido financiada por el Proyecto Nacional OstreoRisk 2015-2017 (Proliferaciones nocivas de Ostreopsis en el Mediterráneo Noroccidental: evaluación de los riesgos potenciales para la salud, CTM2014-53818-R, AEI/FEDER, UE), el proyecto CoCliME 2017-2020 (Co-development of Climate services for adaptation to changing Marine Ecosystems; ERA4CS, con co-financiación de FORMAS, Suecia y la UE Grant 690462) VII Congreso de Comunicación Social de la Ciencia, 9-11 October 2019, Burgos.-- 5 pages, 2 figures

AkvaGIS is a novel, free and open source module included in the FREEWAT plugin for QGIS that supplies a standardized and easy-to-use workflow for the storage, management, visualization and analysis of hydrochemical and hydrogeological data. The main application is devised to simplify the characterization of groundwater bodies for the purpose of building rigorous and data-based environmental conceptual models (as required in Europe by the Water Framework Directive). For data-based groundwater management, AkvaGIS can be used to prepare input files for most groundwater flow numerical models in all of the available formats in QGIS. AkvaGIS is applied in the Walloon Region (Belgium) to demonstrate its functionalities. The results support a better understanding of the hydrochemical relationship among aquifers in the region and can be used as a baseline for the development of new analyses, e.g., further delineation of nitrate vulnerable zones and management of the monitoring network to control chemical spatial and temporal evolution. AkvaGIS can be expanded and adapted for further environmental applications as the FREEWAT community grows.

Settling particles were collected using sediment traps deployed along three transects in the Lacaze-Duthiers and Cap de Creus canyons and the adjacent southern open slope from October 2005 to October 2006. The settling material was analyzed to obtain total mass fluxes and main constituent contents (organic matter, opal, calcium carbonate, and siliciclastics). Cascades of dense shelf water from the continental shelf edge to the lower continental slope occurred from January to March 2006. They were traced through strong negative near-bottom temperature anomalies and increased current speeds, and generated two intense pulses of mass fluxes in January and March 2006. This oceanographic phenomenon appeared as the major physical forcing of settling particles at almost all stations, and caused both high seasonal variability in mass fluxes and important qualitative changes in settling material. Fluxes during the dense shelf water cascading (DSWC) event ranged from 90.1 g m−2 d−1 at the middle Cap de Creus canyon (1000 m) to 3.2 g m−2 d−1 at the canyon mouth (1900 m). Fractions of organic matter, opal and calcium carbonate components increased seaward, thus diminishing the siliciclastic fraction. Temporal variability of the major components was larger in the canyon mouth and open slope sites, due to the mixed impact of dense shelf water cascading processes and the pelagic biological production. Results indicate that the cascading event remobilized and homogenized large amounts of material down canyon and southwardly along the continental slope contributing to a better understanding of the off-shelf particle transport and the internal dynamics of DSWC events.

In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2, as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2, with their longer heritage.