- home
- Advanced Search
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2020 Germany, France, Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, BelgiumCopernicus GmbH ARC | Special Research Initiati..., NSF | The Management and Operat..., NSF | RAPID: Ocean Forcing for ... +8 projectsARC| Special Research Initiatives - Grant ID: SR140300001 ,NSF| The Management and Operation of the National Center for Atmoshperic Research (NCAR) ,NSF| RAPID: Ocean Forcing for Ice Sheet Models for the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report ,NWO| Quality assured industrial scale production of eave tube inserts for malaria control in Africa ,EC| ERA-PLANET ,NWO| Perturbations of System Earth: Reading the Past to Project the Future - A proposal to create the Netherlands Earth System Science Centre (ESSC) ,ANR| TROIS-AS ,AKA| The impact of Antarctic Ice Sheet - Southern Ocean interactions on marine ice sheet stability and ocean circulation/ Consortium: COLD ,AKA| Simulating Antarctic marine ice sheet stability and multi-century contributions to sea level rise ,NSF| NSF-NERC: PROcesses, drivers, Predictions: Modeling the response of Thwaites Glacier over the next Century using Ice/Ocean Coupled Models (PROPHET) ,EC| TiPACCsH. Seroussi; S. Nowicki; A. J. Payne; H. Goelzer; H. Goelzer; W. H. Lipscomb; A. Abe-Ouchi; C. Agosta; T. Albrecht; X. Asay-Davis; A. Barthel; R. Calov; R. Cullather; C. Dumas; B. K. Galton-Fenzi; R. Gladstone; N. R. Golledge; J. M. Gregory; J. M. Gregory; R. Greve; R. Greve; T. Hattermann; T. Hattermann; M. J. Hoffman; A. Humbert; A. Humbert; P. Huybrechts; N. C. Jourdain; T. Kleiner; E. Larour; G. R. Leguy; D. P. Lowry; C. M. Little; M. Morlighem; F. Pattyn; T. Pelle; S. F. Price; A. Quiquet; R. Reese; N.-J. Schlegel; A. Shepherd; E. Simon; R. S. Smith; F. Straneo; S. Sun; L. D. Trusel; J. Van Breedam; R. S. W. van de Wal; R. S. W. van de Wal; R. Winkelmann; R. Winkelmann; C. Zhao; T. Zhang; T. Zwinger;Abstract. Ice flow models of the Antarctic ice sheet are commonly used to simulate its future evolution inresponse to different climate scenarios and assess the mass loss that would contribute tofuture sea level rise. However, there is currently no consensus on estimates of the future massbalance of the ice sheet, primarily because of differences in the representation of physicalprocesses, forcings employed and initial states of ice sheet models. This study presentsresults from ice flow model simulations from 13 international groups focusing on the evolutionof the Antarctic ice sheet during the period 2015–2100 as part of the Ice Sheet ModelIntercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). They are forced with outputs from a subset of models from theCoupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), representative of the spread in climatemodel results. Simulations of the Antarctic ice sheet contribution to sea level rise in responseto increased warming during this period varies between −7.8 and 30.0 cm of sea level equivalent(SLE) under Representative ConcentrationPathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario forcing. These numbers are relative to a control experiment withconstant climate conditions and should therefore be added to the mass loss contribution underclimate conditions similar to present-day conditions over the same period. The simulated evolution of theWest Antarctic ice sheet varies widely among models, with an overall mass loss, up to 18.0 cm SLE, in response to changes in oceanic conditions. East Antarctica mass change varies between −6.1 and8.3 cm SLE in the simulations, with a significant increase in surface mass balance outweighingthe increased ice discharge under most RCP 8.5 scenario forcings. The inclusion of ice shelfcollapse, here assumed to be caused by large amounts of liquid water ponding at the surface ofice shelves, yields an additional simulated mass loss of 28 mm compared to simulations without iceshelf collapse. The largest sources of uncertainty come from the climate forcing, the ocean-induced melt rates, thecalibration of these melt rates based on oceanic conditions taken outside of ice shelf cavitiesand the ice sheet dynamic response to these oceanic changes. Results under RCP 2.6 scenario basedon two CMIP5 climate models show an additional mass loss of 0 and 3 cm of SLE on average compared tosimulations done under present-day conditions for the two CMIP5 forcings used and displaylimited mass gain in East Antarctica. info:eu-repo/semantics/published
CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggre... arrow_drop_down NARCIS; Utrecht University RepositoryArticle . 2020The Cryosphere; Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research Portal; The Cryosphere (TC)Other literature type . Article . 2020Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2020Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu162 citations 162 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 4visibility views 4 download downloads 21 Powered bymore_vert CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggre... arrow_drop_down NARCIS; Utrecht University RepositoryArticle . 2020The Cryosphere; Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research Portal; The Cryosphere (TC)Other literature type . Article . 2020Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2020Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euapps Other research product2018 English AKA | Novel Assessment of Black..., EC | PEGASOS, EC | ACCESSAKA| Novel Assessment of Black Carbon in the Eurasian Arctic: From Historical Concentrations and Sources to Future Climate Impacts (NABCEA) / Consortium: NABCEA ,EC| PEGASOS ,EC| ACCESSAuthors: Räisänen, Petri; Makkonen, Risto; Kirkevåg, Alf; Debernard, Jens B.;Räisänen, Petri; Makkonen, Risto; Kirkevåg, Alf; Debernard, Jens B.;Snow consists of non-spherical grains of various shapes and sizes. Still, in radiative transfer calculations, snow grains are often treated as spherical. This also applies to the computation of snow albedo in the Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR) model and in the Los Alamos sea ice model, version 4 (CICE4), both of which are employed in the Community Earth System Model and in the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM). In this study, we evaluate the effect of snow grain shape on climate simulated by NorESM in a slab ocean configuration of the model. An experiment with spherical snow grains (SPH) is compared with another (NONSPH) in which the snow shortwave single-scattering properties are based on a combination of three non-spherical snow grain shapes optimized using measurements of angular scattering by blowing snow. The key difference between these treatments is that the asymmetry parameter is smaller in the non-spherical case (0.77–0.78 in the visible region) than in the spherical case ( ≈ 0.89). Therefore, for the same effective snow grain size (or equivalently, the same specific projected area), the snow broadband albedo is higher when assuming non-spherical rather than spherical snow grains, typically by 0.02–0.03. Considering the spherical case as the baseline, this results in an instantaneous negative change in net shortwave radiation with a global-mean top-of-the-model value of ca. −0.22 W m−2. Although this global-mean radiative effect is rather modest, the impacts on the climate simulated by NorESM are substantial. The global annual-mean 2 m air temperature in NONSPH is 1.17 K lower than in SPH, with substantially larger differences at high latitudes. The climatic response is amplified by strong snow and sea ice feedbacks. It is further demonstrated that the effect of snow grain shape could be largely offset by adjusting the snow grain size. When assuming non-spherical snow grains with the parameterized grain size increased by ca. 70 %, the climatic differences to the SPH experiment become very small. Finally, the impact of assumed snow grain shape on the radiative effects of absorbing aerosols in snow is discussed.
All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=copernicuspu::3955330bcf123c9257d8ed7cffd8d98a&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=copernicuspu::3955330bcf123c9257d8ed7cffd8d98a&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2020 Germany, France, Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, BelgiumCopernicus GmbH ARC | Special Research Initiati..., NSF | The Management and Operat..., NSF | RAPID: Ocean Forcing for ... +8 projectsARC| Special Research Initiatives - Grant ID: SR140300001 ,NSF| The Management and Operation of the National Center for Atmoshperic Research (NCAR) ,NSF| RAPID: Ocean Forcing for Ice Sheet Models for the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report ,NWO| Quality assured industrial scale production of eave tube inserts for malaria control in Africa ,EC| ERA-PLANET ,NWO| Perturbations of System Earth: Reading the Past to Project the Future - A proposal to create the Netherlands Earth System Science Centre (ESSC) ,ANR| TROIS-AS ,AKA| The impact of Antarctic Ice Sheet - Southern Ocean interactions on marine ice sheet stability and ocean circulation/ Consortium: COLD ,AKA| Simulating Antarctic marine ice sheet stability and multi-century contributions to sea level rise ,NSF| NSF-NERC: PROcesses, drivers, Predictions: Modeling the response of Thwaites Glacier over the next Century using Ice/Ocean Coupled Models (PROPHET) ,EC| TiPACCsH. Seroussi; S. Nowicki; A. J. Payne; H. Goelzer; H. Goelzer; W. H. Lipscomb; A. Abe-Ouchi; C. Agosta; T. Albrecht; X. Asay-Davis; A. Barthel; R. Calov; R. Cullather; C. Dumas; B. K. Galton-Fenzi; R. Gladstone; N. R. Golledge; J. M. Gregory; J. M. Gregory; R. Greve; R. Greve; T. Hattermann; T. Hattermann; M. J. Hoffman; A. Humbert; A. Humbert; P. Huybrechts; N. C. Jourdain; T. Kleiner; E. Larour; G. R. Leguy; D. P. Lowry; C. M. Little; M. Morlighem; F. Pattyn; T. Pelle; S. F. Price; A. Quiquet; R. Reese; N.-J. Schlegel; A. Shepherd; E. Simon; R. S. Smith; F. Straneo; S. Sun; L. D. Trusel; J. Van Breedam; R. S. W. van de Wal; R. S. W. van de Wal; R. Winkelmann; R. Winkelmann; C. Zhao; T. Zhang; T. Zwinger;Abstract. Ice flow models of the Antarctic ice sheet are commonly used to simulate its future evolution inresponse to different climate scenarios and assess the mass loss that would contribute tofuture sea level rise. However, there is currently no consensus on estimates of the future massbalance of the ice sheet, primarily because of differences in the representation of physicalprocesses, forcings employed and initial states of ice sheet models. This study presentsresults from ice flow model simulations from 13 international groups focusing on the evolutionof the Antarctic ice sheet during the period 2015–2100 as part of the Ice Sheet ModelIntercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). They are forced with outputs from a subset of models from theCoupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), representative of the spread in climatemodel results. Simulations of the Antarctic ice sheet contribution to sea level rise in responseto increased warming during this period varies between −7.8 and 30.0 cm of sea level equivalent(SLE) under Representative ConcentrationPathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario forcing. These numbers are relative to a control experiment withconstant climate conditions and should therefore be added to the mass loss contribution underclimate conditions similar to present-day conditions over the same period. The simulated evolution of theWest Antarctic ice sheet varies widely among models, with an overall mass loss, up to 18.0 cm SLE, in response to changes in oceanic conditions. East Antarctica mass change varies between −6.1 and8.3 cm SLE in the simulations, with a significant increase in surface mass balance outweighingthe increased ice discharge under most RCP 8.5 scenario forcings. The inclusion of ice shelfcollapse, here assumed to be caused by large amounts of liquid water ponding at the surface ofice shelves, yields an additional simulated mass loss of 28 mm compared to simulations without iceshelf collapse. The largest sources of uncertainty come from the climate forcing, the ocean-induced melt rates, thecalibration of these melt rates based on oceanic conditions taken outside of ice shelf cavitiesand the ice sheet dynamic response to these oceanic changes. Results under RCP 2.6 scenario basedon two CMIP5 climate models show an additional mass loss of 0 and 3 cm of SLE on average compared tosimulations done under present-day conditions for the two CMIP5 forcings used and displaylimited mass gain in East Antarctica. info:eu-repo/semantics/published
CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggre... arrow_drop_down NARCIS; Utrecht University RepositoryArticle . 2020The Cryosphere; Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research Portal; The Cryosphere (TC)Other literature type . Article . 2020Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2020Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu162 citations 162 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
visibility 4visibility views 4 download downloads 21 Powered bymore_vert CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggre... arrow_drop_down NARCIS; Utrecht University RepositoryArticle . 2020The Cryosphere; Vrije Universiteit Brussel Research Portal; The Cryosphere (TC)Other literature type . Article . 2020Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2020Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euapps Other research product2018 English AKA | Novel Assessment of Black..., EC | PEGASOS, EC | ACCESSAKA| Novel Assessment of Black Carbon in the Eurasian Arctic: From Historical Concentrations and Sources to Future Climate Impacts (NABCEA) / Consortium: NABCEA ,EC| PEGASOS ,EC| ACCESSAuthors: Räisänen, Petri; Makkonen, Risto; Kirkevåg, Alf; Debernard, Jens B.;Räisänen, Petri; Makkonen, Risto; Kirkevåg, Alf; Debernard, Jens B.;Snow consists of non-spherical grains of various shapes and sizes. Still, in radiative transfer calculations, snow grains are often treated as spherical. This also applies to the computation of snow albedo in the Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR) model and in the Los Alamos sea ice model, version 4 (CICE4), both of which are employed in the Community Earth System Model and in the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM). In this study, we evaluate the effect of snow grain shape on climate simulated by NorESM in a slab ocean configuration of the model. An experiment with spherical snow grains (SPH) is compared with another (NONSPH) in which the snow shortwave single-scattering properties are based on a combination of three non-spherical snow grain shapes optimized using measurements of angular scattering by blowing snow. The key difference between these treatments is that the asymmetry parameter is smaller in the non-spherical case (0.77–0.78 in the visible region) than in the spherical case ( ≈ 0.89). Therefore, for the same effective snow grain size (or equivalently, the same specific projected area), the snow broadband albedo is higher when assuming non-spherical rather than spherical snow grains, typically by 0.02–0.03. Considering the spherical case as the baseline, this results in an instantaneous negative change in net shortwave radiation with a global-mean top-of-the-model value of ca. −0.22 W m−2. Although this global-mean radiative effect is rather modest, the impacts on the climate simulated by NorESM are substantial. The global annual-mean 2 m air temperature in NONSPH is 1.17 K lower than in SPH, with substantially larger differences at high latitudes. The climatic response is amplified by strong snow and sea ice feedbacks. It is further demonstrated that the effect of snow grain shape could be largely offset by adjusting the snow grain size. When assuming non-spherical snow grains with the parameterized grain size increased by ca. 70 %, the climatic differences to the SPH experiment become very small. Finally, the impact of assumed snow grain shape on the radiative effects of absorbing aerosols in snow is discussed.
All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=copernicuspu::3955330bcf123c9257d8ed7cffd8d98a&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu0 citations 0 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=copernicuspu::3955330bcf123c9257d8ed7cffd8d98a&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu